Latest history revision: black washing the founding of the USA (Hamilton)

I despise modern (((entertainment))) but was recently I had to suffer through a musical named ‘Hamilton’ which is about our founding fathers.  It is tough to talk about it without seeing the very apparent flaws and blackwashing of our history.  At its root the musical talks about the revolution and how Hamilton was intrumental, portraying him in a very favorable light.

Here’s a picture of the founding fathers.

The entire musical is told in a rap battle between the people.  In case you can’t tell NEARLY EVERYONE in the play is black or some type of minority – all while representing our WHITE founding fathers.

Hamilton is portrayed very sympathetically, including many lines about ‘immigrants get things done’, replete with profanity across the musical.

Hamilton was in reality:

an immigrant

a banker stooge

schooled at a jewish school

essentially the first major banker that helped set up the fucked up banking system that has enslaved us.

Regardless, while the play is interesting from a historical perspective, it proceeds as a straight CIA psyop, the only major white character is the King of england who is portrayed as a little bitch.  Other than that we have these blacks jumping around hollering about ‘revolting’ and somehow being our founding fathers.

All you need to do is look at the picture to know what is the latest out of the the cultural marxism.



Sites to get info from

Here is another collection, this time mostly a do-not go list.

First, one you should hit UP: – this is a good alternative to jewpedia – good ‘real news’ and commenters are jew aware – really intellectual and covers a lot of aryan culture etc



Stay away from wikipedia, this site used to be legit circa 2008, but it has become this subtle cess pool of YKWism mixed with bourgeois pseudo-intellectualism.  I am intelligent, upper percentile for sure, and the way these articles are written are purposely obfuscating to such a degree I am convinced they are written in a way to make people think they are dumber than they are.

It is stunning just how bad this website is, you have to shuffle through PARAGRAPHS of bullshit to find anything.  Literally the first paragraph of EVERY entry is useless bullshit about whatever you are looking up.  They have a subtle sjw/jew bend.  I haven’t seriously used this site in years as any time I go there its the same shit.



This site is such a joke, it is a good place to go to see just how degenerate the regressive left has become.  The don’t even hide their bias.  On blogs people rarely style themselves as impartial: I don’t pretend to be, I dislike the jews for their tribalism for themselves only, and ruining many countries, I hate feminism etc etc.  This site legitmately tries to pretend they are a wiki that is in touch with truth.  Of course any man-osphere, alt right, pro trump thing at all is UTTERLY bashed for pages on end.  Then they praise those poor martyrs of the left fighting against nazi trolls.

It’s hipster fagism to the highest level.  I have had actual people quote me this site, demonstrating their atheist ‘cool kid’ syndrome and of course their intellectual infantilism in a single mention of the site.


Perspectives of the truth


I thought this was an apropos picture, of course it would be used by leftists Im sure to say thats why multicultualism is good.  Justifying why we need some more cultural enrichment for us.

In college, this hyper liberal one I went to, as stated in the past where everything now happened ten years ago (tranny rights, no bathrooms etc) they CONSTANTLY had ‘cultural night’ where youd have the muslims, the blacks make their food.  (what is black food btw?) the two indians in the school etc etc.  Considering the school was 90% white, you know what section(s) were missing?  Of course you do.

How come their wasn’t ‘american’ or basically ANY euro food?


I think there is not a ‘huge’ conspiracy at all levels, not that I don’t buy its mainly the jews, and traitorous whites, but that a majority of people have what might be some suicidal mentality that is easy to trigger and co-opt.  Thus ‘lets bring them all in!’ triggers no problem even though it leads to your lineage end.

Movements will be stopped, and the people will be ‘moderated’

There will be no stopping the final years of the globalization/capitalism juggernaut that is currently in motion rendering a majority of the world’s population while a small tribal elite continue to become richer. People are generally too stupid, too prone to propaganda, and the machine is too well entrenched for any realistic chance of ‘change’ to occur, by far one of the biggest ways this occurs is through co-option of movements, rendering them null from within, further amplified by a endless praise of a Hegelian dialectic as some sort of truth.

What I want to briefly sketch out today is the multipronged attack the people are neutered and the profit-machine will continue to roll with the rich getting richer until its inevitable crash when oil runs out.

Income Inequality

Income inequality is by far one of the biggest problems that exist today, the sheer scale of the inequality is nearly incomprehensible, I will be taking on both US parties in this, and this is one of the largest failings of the Republican party, the justification of said inequality. Let me state it bluntly, I do not believe people are equal, and until we start a eugenics or genetic engineering program, we will not be. However, I also realized that most people are within 3 standard deviations of each other. The military has a good Socialist pay scale where there is only a 10x factor of pay from the highest general to the lowest private. Much different than the lauded ‘free market’ that has produced insane outcomes of many full time workers making less than 20k a year, while CEOs pull in millions or billions, suggesting – absurdly I might add- that one CEO is worth 50,000 to 1 million peons. Put in a different way, this inequality suggest that say an average person can benchpress 70 pounds, said CEO is so strong, he is benching 350,000 pounds, because that’s how much more of a person he is – quite ludicrous.

Walmart truth

My point here is not to harp on the income equality, a cursory search online can find you tons of info, but watch what happens to movements that challenge the status quo. First look at the Tea Party, I didn’t agree with their stances as its far to Libertarian for my tastes, but their ranks swelled with people angry and wanting change. Their height was arguably somewhere around 2010, but as usual protocols, they were infiltrated, marginalized, and effectively removed as a threat. What was a threat to the power, has been reduced to a laughing stock. Consider ‘Occupy Wallstreet’ I have never seen a populist movement gain so fast, and then be taken down to fast. They cut to a true heart of major issues: income inequality. Notice how fast the machine was put into motion such as Fox news denouncing them as ‘spoiled privileged hypocrites’ etc.

The culutural Marxism set upon our society by the Tribes is most notable by the stupidity of the Hegelian Dieletic that poisons our discourse. Few know what this even is, essentialy Hegel was a german who Marx, a Jew, took from extensively in the creation of Marxism. The idea is that if you take Issue A, and Issue B, the ‘TRUTH’ is a synthesis of the two of them. Profoundly stupid, but I will demonstrate how this Marxism effects us today.

First think of conventional politics in the US, using a deeply flawed ‘left/right’ scale, the more on the dge you get, the more ‘extreme’/fanatical you are. Being called a ‘Moderate’ is some sort of badge of honor, as if in…hmm exactly like Hegel’s words…the truth is in the middle. The idea that the more to the left or right you get the more ‘wrong’ you get, and the more middle you are the more ‘correct’ you are. Of course nothing is further from the truth. In the middle you have completely swallowed the propaganda, you are watching CNN/FOX, you believe Obama and Bush are different etc etc.   Frankly, it’d be better if you were extreme but wrong, such as thinking ‘Nazi’s rule the white house’.

But there is an important subtly here, and I want to end on that. I have established that the moneyed elite prefer a ‘moderate’ who has synthesized both sides, who perhaps is ‘against abortion except in rape and incest’…who gives a flying fuck about abortion when we are in the final years of both our empire, and the global economy!?   I have stated this before on  that ‘both sides’ have truth…but it is unadulterated truth! You do not need to water that shit down, its when you ‘moderate’ these beliefs they are wrong. The key is that you have to PICK AND CHOOSE from each side, each ‘issue’ is separate, just because I think the citizenry should be armed does not mean I love churches, far from it. Just because income gap and the environmental degradation are real issues doesn’t mean I have faggot love or at all support feminists. You need to be extreme, and you need to be proud and stand by your convictions. Because that is exactly what they don’t want you to do, they want to shove you into a nice little moderate sheeple box that is easy to manipulate so that ‘terrorism’ suddenly justifies a militant police force, or that ‘economic gain’ somehow justifies the complete obliteration of protectionism of our own goods etc.

So come to you own conclusions, the more extreme the better, because you will go searching, and that’s exactly what they don’t want you to do.


Truth on ‘both’ sides – Keystone Pipeline

A very important lesson to understand is that the false dichotomy of the ‘left vs right’ is just that: false. By having truth on each side, it makes the believes of the entire package rabid ‘how can you deny x!?’ and because both have aspects of it, both are endlessly devoted and never question.

It is a bit of a stupid irony perhaps that so often people take on the entire set of beliefs, often fairly disparate in nature. For ease, let us simplify and say that a policitcal party has 10 core beliefs, for a quick example some republican ones might be ‘guns, religion, small government, low taxes, military spending’ and democrats ‘environment, economic security nets, diversity, workers rights’.

I could write a book on the disparity of positions within the self-contradictory set of beliefs, but I will leave it with a simple example of both.

The democrats for example preach an economic unity model of ‘we are all in this today’ of economic interdependence –something I support actually – but then they hold the completely contradictory belief that some groups are more equal than others, such as minorities and women who are elevated above the white males who built the society.

The republicans are not any better, they claim they don’t want the government involved in anything, but have no problem letting churches run rampart in their nearly lawless and untouchable fashion, or refuse to tax the rich ‘job creators’ on the mistaken belief that they too will be there ‘someday’.

Bringing this to the Keystone pipeline, I find this a funny and stupid ‘issue’ that is on the headlines. Here are the facts:

It is not ‘our’ pipeline, short of the short construction there is no long term economic benefit

It does not make us ‘energy independent’ it is simply a transportation system that the oil will be sold on the international market

Spills are inevitable, and the tar sands are 70-110% MORE dirty that conventional oil

It will create somewhere between 5000-20000 jobs for a couple of years, then take about 50 people to maintain.

>This is a pretty simple issue. The keystone pipeline is a bad idea, it is simply the newest in a globalists move for more profits. However, it is a perfect issue to illustrate the dichotomy of beliefs of the ‘lets you and him fight’ so no one sees who really is at fault here. The environmentalists are completely right that this is a disaster waiting to happen for nearly no gain, and the republicans see ‘jobs’ and don’t realize the short sighted nature. Then it becomes an argument of one side thinking the environment is some sort of unharmable entity that can be dumped into and pillaged endlessly, and the other as some sort of country-sabotaging radical that would kill the populace to save a flower.

And the bankers grin all the way…well to the bank.

Some parting thoughts

There are a few things I want to make sure are said, I want to be clear and have zero equivocation, also I held back from writing this because of its emotionally charged nature, and of some very non-pc things that are going to be said.  I was scared people might not like me, or that some other bad thing would occur, but I am tired of it hanging on my mind, and I going to talk freely.  As always, look it up yourself. Don’t take my word for it, truth does not need to hide in locution or bar its followers from looking elsewhere. LOOK IT UP YOURSELF.

I got a notice that it was my 2 year anniversary on word press, my blog was shorter lived, as I got the name and commented for about 6 months before launching, but regardless, the 2 years ago EK was a bold work in progress cutting through the illusions of my 20s. Take the EK of 3 years ago and I wonder how much of the things I am about to say I would be like ‘who the hell is this?’

I have a ‘friend’ (Truthfully I have lost a lot of my old friends, they are stuck in the same juvenile mindset that most never escape from their whole life) who recently claimed that he would be a catholic regardless of what country he was born in. A pretty stupendously naive statement, that the ‘truth’ you were born into is the actual truth. Its like saying the local football team is the team you would have come to support regardless of where you are born, it defies even the most basic of self-examination. Most people never question this ‘born truth’, and it serves them fine. There is a reason nearly EVERY manosphere guy had a ‘red pill moment’ and that’s because our society is so incredibly indoctrinated, quite the opposite of the ‘freedom’ we believe we live under, that it takes something to shake us to our core. To a lot of guys it may be divorce, or nice guy attitudes being unsuccessful, to me it was that girls will manipulate and use you under the guise of love.

Did you know every major empire (over twenty of them, like the Macedonians, Romans, UK, etc) has gone through nearly the exact same pattern, the US isn’t nearly as unique as we would like to believe, it was the brave frontier/people conquering, the rise to power, the eminence, then the decline which education/social programs/women’s rights/ etc become to the forefront as money became more important than honor. Yes, ‘feminism’ has happened before, Rome, Arab, etc, all at the end of their empire thought they were at their most advanced, as the decadence flourishes as the empire dies. This is a great read about what I just said.

I raged against feminism, it was an easy target for my clearing eyes: it empowered these women who fucked so many of my comrades and myself. Now let me be clear, I have a sister and my mom of which I am both fairly close with, so growing up I was a ‘female supporter’ as my sister was smarted than more guys, as tough etc. ‘Why would men criticize women?’ The major difference was that I think even in my young mind I subscribed to a merit-based model, where you were judged on your deeds, not your sex ie. you either can pass the physical test or you can’t, there is no changing it and you get no accolades passing it as a women.

I maintained a lot of my ‘liberal’ ideologies (and I still maintain a few, like I am a pro-government supporter in that I think there should be a strong national government if we are not going to go with a Confederacy as espoused by Paine) but chinks in the armor developed. So many talked about HBD human-bio-diversity, about how race was real. When my mind was allowed to actually objectively look at the facts it was quite clear. Again from my anecdotal evidence it seemed pretty obvious that blacks in general could run faster but I never met one who I was even convinced possessed beyond an average intellect, but I wasn’t ‘supposed’ to say or think that. Just like I wasn’t supposed to think women had the power, but it was obvious to me they did once I got beyond the illusions.

I think this was a reason I lost a lot of friends, they were plugged into the same stupid shit of ‘Democrat vs Republican’ and arguing if companies should pay for birth control, or if the US should help in Ukraine. How the hell could they understand when I was telling them of the illusion they lived in, the slave existence we are conditioned to accept, or even to tell them simply realities that the laws are pro-women when I get accused of ‘hating women’ or being ‘unsuccessful’ with women! It was pure lunacy mind you, because I had never been more successful with them then when I accepted the harsh truth over the pretty lies. The evidence was stacking up so fast, both in theory and in practice. I saw my friends routinely taken advantage of by women, I’d call exactly what happens to them a few months before it happens, get called ‘angry at women’ and then when my friend get dumped or left or whatever they are confused why it happened. They don’t learn. I have had increasingly little patience with that. I have had a trend I stick with that I always am the last one to respond to a person (not in the gotta-have-the-last-word way but that I will reach out if I haven’t heard in a while) but it takes two to tango and some numbers that remain silent actually are preferred than pretending we have some similarities when our beliefs have completely diverged.

Feminism was the crack a lot of other sacred truths came crashing down. I can legitimately say I was not ‘racist’ at all growing up, the belief seemed bigoted and wrong. It was cultural I completely understand now. When I looked at the facts how could I not come to the obvious conclusion of the near R vs K selection that was occurring in our species? I hold what might be called ‘racist’ beliefs, I think southern hemisphere people are inferior intellectually, and there is a reason there is not a single black ’empire’ of note in history. But I don’t hate blacks, etc, they are just pawns in a large game we are all part of.

A big thing was the realization of this vast complex of victimization, where everyone except white males was apparently so fucked up by a history of white dominance that everyone now needed bonuses. Victims were EVERYWHERE, you had women, blacks, jews, homos, all of them saying how evil the white man was, and then these endless liberal white men agreeing how bad they were, and they will take their pegging at your disenfranchised leisure.

Either you are equal, so you don’t need an advantage, or you are inferior and you need an advantage to make it competitive, despite what feminists and NAACP says, evidence shows you need the advantage. This is a perfect example where medical school scores are nearly meaningless and simply being black is enough to get in.

I long knew there were forces in control beyond just the president, I was a huge alex jones fan for a while, convinced that 2012 it was on, that the ‘nazis’ were taking over. But my better judgment prevailed and thoughts of ‘why hasn’t this happened yet…he sure is a fear monger’ helped me move past. I came to see that what we actually faced was a monolithic force that the media intentionally hides from us: jewish elite control, now before your mind ‘slides’ off the topic (a CIA term about how we are programmed to automatically discard arguments we dont agree with) did you know that Feminism was nearly entirely jewish? ( Yes, that is right. Jews took down the Romanov family and started perhaps the bloodiest murder of people starting with the Bolshevik revolution, the supposed ‘holocaust’ with even the upper end of 6 million PALES in comparison to the millions upon millions killed by jewish communists just within their own country, not including all the other blood on their hands.

These things were painful for me to swallow at first, ‘but the jews…but the women!’ my child mind said, these were the victims! But fact after fact slowly ground down the old illusions. Here is something to chew on, obviously a site like this has a potential axe to grind, but consider the facts for what they are: that in nearly every power center the <2% race occupies a 900%-3000%+ OVER-representation of the owners and CEOs of these. Guess its that good work ethic…wait why arent the chinese on that list then?

Why for example was germany so ‘evil in ww2 when it was the Treaty of Versailles that economically strangled the Weimar Republic? Did they do anything any brave people would not have when so obviously playing a game rigged against them? Now before any starts crying about ‘evil nazis’ or poor jews or whatever, LOOK AT THE FACTS YOURSELF, both my grand fathers fought in the war on the USA side, I get it. We can’t believe we in fact might have been duped or we might have been the ‘bad guys’. Henry Ford wanted to support germany. General Patton expressed dismay about beating the germans but the true enemy of the communist jews: ‘we have had a victory over the Germans and disarmed them, but we have failed in the liberation of Europe; we have lost the war!’ ( <good site covering this American hero and his ‘wrong’ beliefs)

My learning extended to relativism, the idea that ‘anything goes’ and no one is right. This is the perfect anarchy belief, because then there is no unified force that can challenge the established power structures. Why do you think libertarianism is pushed so hard right now as ‘intellectual’? Its all to trap people that would otherwise actually challenge the system. I found that relativism was in fact a direct plan of the Frankfurt school booted out of german and their goal was ‘cultural marxism’. (Two good reads on this: and ) I had heard this term before but that it was just some meaningless slander like ‘commi’, but no, it is very real, the idea to have all this infighting and ‘anything goes’ attitude to bring decadence, nihilism and eventually chaos to the host country the parasite had found itself in. Sounds like an apt description of America.

I did a lot of research on the Founding Fathers, finding out they were not unified in their plans at all. You had people like Madison and Hamilton that seemed like nothing more than a precursor to the corporate stooge, you had people like Paine who despite being essentially the founder of ‘libertarianism’ is disavowed by many libertarians for too controversial beliefs. Paine espoused a Confederacy of a mutual defense pact and strong state rights. Our early history is not clean or pure, but there was a lot to learn there, like for example the tired attempts of establishing central banks to saddle us with debt. Jefferson: ‘If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and the corporations which grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered’ Later we have great heroes like Jackson who claimed his greatest accomplishment was ‘I killed the bank’ in regard to a central bank.

We follow this pattern into World War 1, where America wanted to stay isolationist, or sided with the Germans, and Wilson establishes the Fed reserve to finance the war, and the sinking of the Listunia happens in may 1915, they try to drum the war, but only once the fed is fully operational do the resurrect the sinking as ‘reason’ to go to war…over two years later. The media kicks into overdrive and suddenly the sinking is an evil that must be punished.

Anyway, I wrote a lot here, most of it likely challenging, hope you read this far instead of ‘racist idiot’ and clicked back. I was the naive, love-everyone liberal who had one fatal flaw of questioning what I was told. Of looking when stuff just didn’t make sense. First it started with feminism but spiraled into so much other stuff, yet was so connected in the end. The suppression of white males, the endless debt we are saddled with, the endless re-write of history, and anyone who speaks about the evil the government does, jews, women etc do it some ignorant racist.

There are some tough questions here, but if you are on the search for truth…no matter the cost – there are some walls you are going have to break down in your mind. If you want to call me racist, ignorant, angry and unsuccessful with women, go right ahead, its so much easier for your mind. But if you care at all, read some things that challenge ‘truth’ because what is so great about it, is truth doesn’t change if you look at something wrong. I wasn’t born with these ideas, I didn’t even start with them, but they are what I have found when I pursued some non-approved learning, challenge yourself a bit, and maybe I will see you on the other side where we have abandoned our illusions and only truth and reality remain.

EK out.

Feminist = ‘Empowered’ = ‘Independent’

What is notably is that there are few women who openly describe themselves as feminists, despite that disease infecting likely 80% of the women, and at least 30% of the males. However, that does not stop them from supporting, or especially taking advantage of the feminist movement. You call always tell the feminists at heart when the use the words ‘empowered’ or ‘independent’ to describe themselves. For all intents when I use ‘feminist’ I am also referring to their new monikers they now go by: liberated/empowered/independent etc

Feminism has largely been successful for a few reasons:

1 it has embraced an ever-present victim methodology in a society afraid to stand for real values,

2 it has given an excuse to women who preform subpar but can hand out laurels to the winners,

3 and has allowed double-think to be normalized.

It typically takes something that shakes a person to their core to even have the potential to question the doctrine they are fed their whole life, so for a majority of men and women the standard narrative they are fed is that ‘women have been enslaved for eons, and only now are we getting out of the dark ages and we still have much work to go, because women have so much catching up to do’.

I put my ego out there a lot on this site as an example others can learn from, and indeed when I was younger, even early 20s, I BELIEVED THIS LIE. Oh, those poor women surrounded by brutes…they needed protection and uplifting to make up for all the past crimes. Needless to say there is a lot of self flagellation going on here as a male. That first of all, there WERE crimes that needed making up, and second, it was my and every males duty to repent.

Men can’t be strong, because then you might rape a women. You can only be strong if you swear to defend a women from other rapists. You can’t be aggressive, well…ever. You can’t yell, you can’t use logic because someone’s feelings may get hurt. However, this has not been applied universally, because the girl that goes to the gym is ‘empowered’, the girl who has an apartment is ‘independent’.

What this has done is anyone women who isn’t successful, well that’s because the odds were against her, that damn patriarchy we live in, men keeping her down, not giving her a chance, not being fair, all these you hear. But then women who achieve even mediocre success are paraded around as if they were the first ones that had gone to the moon and just got back. She works a job and has her own apartment, by god, she’s INDEPENDENT! She left some guy who went over to Iraq and is with some new biker trash? She’s not a treacherous slut, she’s EMPOWERED.

Its like we are treating them like kids, if I was a women I would find such a low bar insulting. But it is not insulting, it literally is a badge of honor, a guy could find a cure for cancer and no one gives a shit, but some girl recently gets promoted to assistant secretary of child psychology and bought a fancy new Honda, goddamn folks we got ourselves a gen-u-ine he-rooo in our midst!

Lastly is the double think that is allowed and encouraged. Let us take the duke student who stars in porns to pay tuition. Now, nearly no one is criticizing her (because you can’t critic a women) regardless of any side of an argument. Imagine a newly similar situation where there was a male PAYING women to make orgy porns and then selling these videos at a profit to ‘pay his way through school’, he would be castrated in the media. But because she is a poor victim, she can choke that dick down and we are supposed to only feel sorry she is forced into this by this cruel world.

Porn and sex has long been a useful doublethink subject for women, on one hand they can decry the objectification of women, treating them as sex objects, etc, but on the other hand USE that to manipulate men. I personally saw this all the time at college, these raging feminists decrying that clothing doesn’t provoke rape then come Friday or Saturday they’d walk over to the frat houses in super short skirts and low cut dresses. (Most of them were claimed they were raped on Monday, but be back there next Friday…disgusting)

Likewise we are told women don’t need men, ok, sounds good to me. But then the divorce comes rocking down and suddenly she is ‘entitled’ to half his wealth just for being with him the last year or two?

Why can a girl be direct about sex, and it makes her tough/empowered, but when a guy talks about it, he is a creep/loser/weird?

Girls can read fashion, gossip, celebrity news, and it doesn’t make them shallow, but if a guy likes the dress or makeup she learned to put on he is suddenly shallow.

Why do we have affirmative action for girls when they are supposedly equal to guys? Either you are not as good, and need an advantage or you are EQUAL like you tell us and do not need an advantage.

These are legitimate doublethinks (1984 term for holding conflicting positions) and I have had a LOT of feminists justify this stupidity to me.

But this entire society is an exercise in doublethink, where the rich are the jobcreators and us proles have to be content with ‘trickle’ down money, where America is the most free nation despite endless spying of its only citizens. So we continue to hand out gold stars to our grownup women celebrating their success, up is down, black is white, and everything you know is wrong.