Hierarchy of Reality Processing

In order to understand a lot of what I talk on here, it is relevant to clarify the way reality is eventually understood, and that is in an expanding mindset that subsumes earlier realities into the narrower focus they are.



A key thing I want to emphasize is that when people (if they ever) go searching you inevitable find clues at the next level, and you start to cling onto them, seeing the previous level as so woefully inadequate to explain reality, and you get to this level and suddenly think ‘you get it’ and that there is nothing beyond. Of course that is wrong, but that’s what happens

Everyone starts at level 1, meaning you don’t really understand much of anything. We all start here as kids, and a lot of adults never really start to understand much about the life they find themselves in.  If they ever process some sort of difference or reality that is when we get to level 2.

Level 2 is the conventional level of people who follow politics. This is the hard ‘left vs right’ dichotomy we are endlessly fed (and is it a wonder few people make it out of this?). As a liberal, you are caring, kind hearted, and want everyone to be equal since we are in this together, conservatives are heartless, blind , gun loving religious whackos. As a conservative you are tough but fair, value independence and pulled yourself up by your bootstraps, liberals are soft pansies, blind, and want to sell the country out to terrorists.

It’s not an accident both sides think the other is blind. A lot of it is by design, that by each of them having grains of truth in their positions the person can point and be like ‘tell me this isn’t true! Tell me!’ Of course we are sold the whole show, that if you like guns, you must also be religious, want to bomb the middle east etc, and if you like the environment you also want gays everywhere and women presidents. It is astounding to me the inherent hypocrisy present on both sides, I am literal as fuck that people believe some good ideas and believe the other total shit that comes with the ‘party’ line.

So, the intrepid truth seeker ventures out, not afraid of his iconoclast nature, maybe challenged in some way or another that his previous notions have been completely wrong, then he arrives at level 3, a higher form of realism, this can take the place of racist, sexist, libertarian etc mindset. What I mean by this, is a person sees the problems and conflictions on both sides and concludes a higher truth that its ‘the women/feminists fault’ ‘it’s the blacks fault’ ‘it’s the governments fault’, and the seduction of it is you can justify the shit out of all of them.

I am speaking openly here, because this was my own personal quest as well, so I see it in others readily. This stage is where the alex jones types pop up, where he hides truth in a veil of lies. Is the government prepared to handle mass ‘domestic terrorists’ (with a vague and shifting definition all the time) with thousands of militarized police? Yes, of course they are, but then he derails the truth into that it’s the Muslims controlling Hollywood, or ‘nazi death cults’, its stupid to look at, but it is actually very effective because they have subsumed the illogic of the lower levels and come to an answer that explains it.

Because the average person at this level will ROCK anyone lower, they will have ample facts to back up their position, they will talk about the mass purchase of MRAP vehicles and link it to the police state, and how are you supposed to argue against that FACT? Or the race realist, when they spout off that 90% of of gun-related deaths are black on black? Or the sex realist who tells you that women get the child is custody cases nearly every time, and that a girl will a bachelors degree is the one who initiates divorce 90%+ of the time?

Level 4 is where I am currently at, I fully grant there is likely higher levels, but at this point its beyond my comprehension, something for example might be sci-fi in nature like the earth is a battle ground for aliens or our religious soul or whatever, and THAT then explains the lower levels. Level 4 is pretty complicated, but also very simple, I will touch on this next. But at this stage, people start asking questions like why are race wars encouraged when all that does is leave the true people in power, or why is that any independent nation or colony is summarily exterminated if it doesn’t play by the globalist rules?

Again, it is SO critical to understand lower truths are there for a reason, but that they are bundled with falsehoods. So take race, are blacks less intelligent than whites? Yes. That is a ‘racist’ statement, and I will admit racial mixing is often the cause of a lot of problems, but and read this carefully I would have absolutely zero problem fighting alongside a black guy because we are NOT each others real enemy. This is exactly like I have wrote with women, a vast majority of them are our current ‘enemies’ because they are brainwashed, but to think their wiping out is the goal is missing the entire point. These groups are encouraged to fight each other, because then we forget who rigged this to begin with.


Dont let a good crisis go to waste – California shooting and feminism


In case you haven’t watch the news (I don’t blame you) there was a shooting in california a few days ago by some rich kid (automatically assuming it’s a guy? Because only guys are evil right?) anyway, it was some guy, early 20s who shot up some people then killed himself. What is notable about this, is the feminist bent the whole thing has taken.

By his own admission in videos he had girl trouble and that girls should have liked him. To be blunt, he was kind of a freak, and the media piles on him for this, but this is where I diverge strongly. There was a multitude of psychologists (all girls, like some sort of shaman/priestess class – they alone can read the stones!) talking about this guy, and I shit you not, this was an exact quote ‘if he had a girl friend this never would have happened’ other quotes along the lines of ‘girls present a modulating influence on young males’ etc.

The blatant-ness of these comments struck me hard in my post-pill awareness. Essentially what they are saying, is that guys – all guys- are one step away from murder rampages, BECAUSE they can’t get a girl, because only girls can ‘calm them down’.

It’s an interesting chicken/egg syndrome, because if the guy is a loser, like him, how exactly are you supposed to achieve the holy grail of a girl friend? It’s an implicit assumption that does not hold up to scrutiny in the slightest. That EVERY guy out there needs a girl to control him (and that every girl would pair with every guy instead of the best getting the lions share) to ‘modulate’ his behavior.

Do you see what this has subtly done? It has shifted the burden of control to women, that men can’t really control themselves, they are just beasts at heart, it takes an independent woman to control that man. Of course with control comes responsibility, but they expertly dodge that, doing some strange circular reasoning that it was his fault; girls can control you but when you snap its not their fault.

Its pretty disturbing, because quite obviously men are violent, but the narrative we are sold is that it is uncontrollable, that women truly are the ‘modulating’ influence on society that without them it would devolve into Road Warrior rampages. It passes off the subtle (and sometimes blatant) truth that women are inherently superior because they control the weaker member of the sexes from dragging the rest of society down. Forgetting men built it in the first place.


Edit: Just tonight (5-27) on ‘world news’ they covered this story, which included the following (paraphrased, I can’t find the link yet) ‘he was part of a small group on the internet that is cycnical and hate filled about women, so called ‘pick up artists’ ‘

It goes on to bash PUAs as, ironically, the belief that ‘being a nice guy entitles you to women’.  The errors in this are pretty profound, namely, that ANY pua would espouse being a ‘nice guy’ as a way to get women, namely the exact opposite.  But it doesnt really matter, all it really shows it that media will distory everything to fit their narrow narrative.

Such as this extremly stupid ‘yes all women’ twitter trend with such gems such as “Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them” or “I shouldn’t have to hold my car keys in hand like a weapon & check over my shoulder every few seconds when I walk at night” (right, because that would be the smart thing to do, nothing to do with ‘misogny’) or “Because I shouldn’t have had to send my daughters to college with pepper spray and a rape whistle” (after all, 1/3 girls are ‘raped’ in college)

Whats sad, is the nightly news segement ended with some girl saying ‘everyone I know has been a victim of unwanted sexual abuse or advances, including myself’ then cut to some ugly fat 40 year old claiming the same thing.  Its the same tired narrative of ‘men = evil’ and ‘women = can do no wrong’

Edit:  I found the link to the audio of abc world news, here it is http://castroller.com/podcasts/AbcWorldNews2/4081194?start=0 skip to 6:00, where we hear about that “a hidden subculture of resentment, cynicism and anger against women where one disturbed man took refgue”, the irony of course is pua/mgtow preaches SNAP THE FUCK OUT OF IT! If you want women, improve your life!  Then we hear that ‘every women i know has experianced some form of sexual harassment’ then some ugly bitch ‘every singl women i know has a story about a man who feels entitled to access to her body’




A punch is just a punch, a girl is just a girl

“Before I learned the art, a punch was just a punch, and a kick, just a kick.
After I learned the art, a punch was no longer a punch, a kick, no longer a kick.
Now that I understand the art, a punch is just a punch and a kick is just a kick.”
— Bruce Lee

I was talking to a friend of mine about girls (a practice I HIGHLY recommend, because regardless of if it seems ‘gay’ you learn so much by sharing your wins and losses – afterall this is how girls become so high level) and I mentioned to him I am not really angry at women anymore.  Which I freely admit I was, simply look at the early posts here.

Prior to my awakening, a girl was ‘just a girl’, kind of dumb, kind of complicated but kind of simple, vain, I could be friends with her without ruining chances of a relationship, generally flaky, find one you like and get married and live happily ever after.  They were mysterious as they were simple, they liked things like flowers and gifts (and a ‘real man’ would buy them these!) yet were mysterious as to why they liked those badboy types on occasion.  Oh well, they were just misguided is all, they wanted a real knight in their life. I would be that knight, dutifully waiting for them to come to their senses.  It was so sweet.


Birth by fire

My delusions of love, of commitment, of everything related to girls was used, abused, and I was left a substantial emotional wreck for about 6 months, and a mild wreck for about a year after that.  I had done ‘everything’ right and I was fucked up for it.  How was this fair, how was this right?  What did I do wrong!?

‘What the fuck happened!?’ I asked myself every day, every minute at times.  It really was this bad, it was this obsession because I was hurt so bad.  Was I not a good enough guy?  Maybe if I just acted nicer…maybe I just needed to ‘man up’, maybe I just needed to accept her and her treacherous slut ways.  Wouldnt that be the ‘knight’ thing to do?  It was so bad, there were times I was ready to move out with this girl, to play second fiddle while she finished lawyer school, I would get a job at a coffee house, it would be hard, but I would be with her, it would be so perfect.  Yes, I had these disgusting thoughts.

I am very fortunate I was raised to be critical by my dad, and to not accept conventional wisdom.  I dove into anything I could find about ‘what the fuck happened’, I came across a BPD board (borderline personality disorder) and …this is what this girl was like!  The push pull, telling me how much she wanted me, how much she loved sex, how much we were going to do sexually, how she couldnt wait to see me…and week after week, holiday after holiday passed, and nothing.  The push/pull was endlessly addicting, and thats why BPD people fuck up others so bad.  You get the strength to walk away during the push phase, of them being mean, only to suddenly ‘sorry, I had a really bad day, I cant wait to see you again.  I was imagining of going down on your last night…im such a bad girl arent i?’

Anyway, so I found this bpd board, people going through similar situations, and in a lot of cases way worse than me.  Losing houses, getting divorced after 10 years, all their wealth split and confiscated, it was mind blowing to me.  Weren’t girls supposed to be the ‘good’ ones?  Werent guys just ‘evil rapists’?  What the fuck was happening in this world where all these nice guys were playing by the rules…and losing!?  Utterly losing! They were getting raped by their girl, and society writ-large.  Wheels started turning.  Maybe not everything was as it seemed.

The term bpd actually got me into the ‘manosphere’ because it seems nearly every guy who came here actually had run ins with bpd girls whether they realized it or not.  I of course was looking up bpd stuff, but then came across key sites like ‘solvemygirlproblems’ ‘chateau hertiste’ and ‘rationale male’ all of which touch on bpd.  Hmm, what is this, calling girls trite little manipulative sluts?  Well thats not very nice of them, hmm, but this is pretty accurate what they are saying.  That girls will rock your shit unless you are completely dialed.  That ‘love’ does not really exist in any meaningful fashion because a girl will leave you for someone better if the opportunity is there.  Well damn…that sure seemed right to me.

I dove HEAD FIRST into this shit.  I read all the archives, I checked new posts religiously. Obviously they were hard into the PUA lifestyle, but damn if they werent right about a lot.  ‘Living for myself’?  Be a real man and the girls will actually like you better?  Nice guys really do finish last?

It was mind blowing.  I was swallowing the pile and saw that the world really was around me.

I was entering the ‘a girl was no longer a girl’ phase where I had been at for about the last year or more.  These little sluts…they would ride the cock from 18 to 30 then settle down for a ‘nice guy’ who was spurned for his whole life and now only wanted for his money and not judging her on failing fertility and sinking looks.  Woah, this goes back to those bpd males, they were the nice guys who got rocked by these whores!!!  ‘Single moms’ were thought to be heroes, not because they were, but because it was part of feminist protocol where a ‘real man’ would take her used ass.  ‘Rape’ gave women the power to have sex freely but blame the man if she regretted it. There was the emerging pattern of girls under about 25 being insanely slutty and hoped from guy to guy, only to 30+ want to ‘settle down’ and was done with the ‘experimenting’ stage of her life, and it made sense why – alpha fucks and beta bucks!

I understood things, things were connecting!

I even put things into practice, ‘no way this shit actually works, but ill try it’  I was dismissive, aggressive, standoffish, not ‘friends’ with girls.  I made fun of them, I embraced saying ‘inappropriate’ things, I only had conversation related to sex with girls.  What the fuck…all these girls want me now?  There was a period where within a week I could have done an 18 year old and done a 40 year old, I am glad neither happened, but it was basically on until I pushed them off.  Hookups came easily.  I remember walking away from one girl trying to get me off telling her ‘this wasnt working’ and never seeing her again, wow, what a badass I had become!

In my mind there was all these connections, all these little signs.  A girl could say this, or I say that which would lead to these predictable outcomes.  I had my shit dialed, I had one girl sending me naked pics WHILE she had a boyfriend.

Body language, tone, word choice, all this shit mattered, and was very important.  In general silence and distance was generally the right choice, with occasional bursts of sex-charged flirts and jokes.  It defied logic, but not talking to girls made them want me even more.  I even had tacit admitting to this by some girls text something like ‘you know when you ignore me it makes me want you even more’

I was this cold, cocky badass on the outside, but on the inside I was full of anger, of rage.  These fucking feminists!  Every new article from jizbelle and every fucking feminist argument was so clearly wrong, what the fuck was wrong with these people believing it?  I wanted to slap the shit out of every girl I saw – but realized the white knight society that would take me down in a heart beat.  Fools, didn’t they know the real enemy!?

I saw the game, I was winning the game!  I had anger no one else understood it…but whatever at least I understood unlike everyone else barring this small online niche.  I had this friend who is with this ugly ass girl who locks his life down, and he was telling me ‘girl advice’ I would laugh in his face, because he was in the old mindset that ‘girlfriend = winner single=loser’ oblivious to that his life was controlled by her, and I could have sex with girls just as easily (easier in fact since she controlled the flow)

But things started changing.  I had this blinding light, this anger that burned away all delusion, and do not misunderstand, I am not going to say anger was bad, it was so critical to my growth, but eventually it was like ‘why I am still angry’?  I understood the game.  I could rage all I wanted, but it changed nothing.  All that was productive was to share my experiences with those that would listen (like how I first became aware) and to the end I have succeeded at I know at least two guys in real life I had woken up to ‘the score’ we face.  Our feminist society will kill itself, so that will ultimately fail.  And my endless anger was hurting myself, I was scarring my heart, maybe raising my blood pressure.

I started blogging mainly to express my rage.  If I did not fight feminism, I was complacent in it.  It was great, I could write and write about the fucked up reality of females in our current society.  I found out people who came from different backgrounds and we’re FINDING THE SAME THING.  It was a collection of divergent thinkers, and we were arriving at the same conclusions, not this force-fed ‘knowledge’ society tells us about how bad it is to be a male and how sorry you should be about that.

For a while, my anger actually increased.  We were outgunned, but we had facts and reality on our side.  I would not give up until feminism had been taken down.

But…somewhere within the last 6-9 months my rage and anger had changed to understanding.  Not at once certainly, there were times I thought I didn’t know what the fuck was happening, or that my anger came back, these fucking feminists!!! But the catharsis slowly continued on.

My friend for example would never get it until his girl left him, until then I would just gingerly smile about his ‘advice’, girls would cry about the wage gap – maybe I would even tell them a fact or two, but in the end these people were lost, simply smile I knew the matrix and they did not.

I met some great people, guys from the army, guys from other countries, all these interesting, varied experiences, but we all were coming to similar conclusions.  Those who sought answers would find the truth, and it didnt matter the background except being fucked up by a girl or largely unsuccessful with girls and wondering why.

I feel it important to add at this point a short blurb about females, early on I was surprised to see girls in the manosphere, apparently ‘friendly’ to the cause.  I was like ‘oh yeah, it is self evident of course they would help!’  I am not going to go into details here, but suffice to say I view girls in the manosphere more of ‘enemies of my enemies’ rather than allies.  They have their own ego-driven agendas I have come to realize, that is fine, but it simply needs to be understood.  Girls are attracted to the manosphere because of the attention they are given among other reasons, (as a quick aside, I find it very ironic the men who susposedly ‘get it’ but still give in to female attention whoring on blogs, CH’s comments are the worst in this regard) but again at its root understand they are temporarily ‘allies’ much like Russia was during ww2.

Anyway, perhaps you might see a bit of change just in that last paragraph, normally I might be like ‘those fucking traitorous spies!  Fuck them!!!’  But its like…that is how they are.  I understand that.  It would be like being mad at gravity for being heavy – its just the way it is.  Girls are using us, and we can use them to show not every girl falls for feminism.

I slowly understood girls were simple.  Dating was simple.  There were rules you had to be aware of, completely different then conventionally taught to us, but they were there.  Girls liked things like power, status, aggression, anger, they liked being mistreated because it was drama to them, they liked talking shit, they liked trying to get a rise out of you.  I didn’t make these rules, I just came to understand them.  Gravity was heavy, I didnt make the rule, I just had to understand the rule.

I came to understand the game was rigged against males.  The prize was often not worth the hunt.  American girls by and large were obese, bitchy and self-entitled.  It is easy to rationalize not bothering with them – the whole MGTOW movement.  Regardless, I came to understand the ‘machine gunner’ approach to girls vs the ‘sniper’ because a single girl as the object of affection will ruin you.  I could be back to square one after years of growth.

I realized I could not spill my heart out to girls.  The more emotional I was, the more they disliked me.  I had to be the hard, stoic badass.  Well fine, I wanted to be that anyway.  Society had been the one to lie and say females wanted ’emotional males’.

Nothing was complicated anymore.  People say ‘girls are confusing/mysterious’ and I think, not in the slightest.  You simply need to change how you view things, you are judging by the wrong metric.  When a 24 year old girl divorces her ‘perfect’ husband everyone is confused, I’m not, she is still desirable and found some other better guy.  I see guys hugging their girls in public and only think ‘that is shortening your time with her’, his misplaced protective instincts were making him look more pathetic.  Girls gave me little beyond sex.  Guys were smarter, more loyal and could have real conversations.  Girls conversations were either to be non-existent or sexual charged, those were the new rules I was to except.  I would assume dominating body posture, I would watch hers for signs of interest, and change pace when hers faltered.  Most importantly I lived for me, not just for slamming some broad out, and it freed me from all the stupid obligations like wasting money on her when it did not to improve my chances.

EVERY girl I hooked up with beyond the first that started this whole thing…I didnt spend any money on, not a dime.  My former self would have never understood this, or thought the girls I was with were ‘just the shallow ones’.

But I understood.  All the rules, all the little games, the body language, the texts, it was complicated if you wanted it to be, but it was ultimately so simple.  You had to play the right way if you wanted to win.  If you did not want to play that was fine as well.  But I knew, I had synthesized all the information and experience from my life.  I had been playing the wrong game, or perhaps I had been playing the right game by the wrong rules, rules society purposely mis-feeds guys.  It was simple, I knew the rules now.  Confirmed by others and my own experience. I knew how things worked.

I had no reason to be mad anymore.

Afterall, a girl is just a girl.


Even good (?) intentions can be bad

I’d be out of action the last week or so, but coming back I had a slew of comments to go through (and readers who dont comment, I make it a habit to respond to every new commenter, and often respond to any comments in general other than between people) and this one caught my attention enough to write a post about.

In my last post Eurdite Dark Knight (sic) wrote a long comment, I think it was supposed to be inspiring, or maybe advice, but it comes across as someone still plugged-in / pre-pill where they want to help you, but their advice is given by someone who hasn’t been there, and doesnt really know.  It would be easy to attack the person, but I think there is a legitimate chance they were attempting to be ‘helpful’ so I will simply talk about their argument.

Eurdite Dark Knight: ‘You seem to think that the entire female sex is less than you in almost every way. When in reality there are some women out there that are, dare i say it, smarter and stronger than you. They might even be in love with men who are “better” than you, in EVERY way. What happens when the hero of your story loses? When he realizes he is not the most superior being in his world.’

This has a few problems, first of all it is a heavy strawman argument that makes it easier to start the bashing, second, this is a very heavy ‘NAWALT!!!’ argument (not all women are like that).  I talk a bit about NAWALT-ism here (https://eruditeknight.wordpress.com/2013/10/12/why-i-write/) but this is a low level argument you encounter frequently once you start to wake up to the reality around us.  At its most base, it posits that because literally NOT ALL women can be that bitchy/slutty/stupid/etc the claim is therefore false.

This fallacy is a mix of Anecdotal and Texas sharpshooter, where because this person ‘knows a girl’ who is not part of the claim, it therefore disproves it, because they cherry pick their exception (often female Olympians to prove males arent stronger) the fallacy concludes that this is a valid argument.  Of course, it isnt, a exception does not an argument make.  Or, depending on how its phrased, it could be a ‘Special pleading’ fallacy that where a claim is shown to be wrong, attempts to ‘plead’ for an exception, thus ‘not all women are like that’.

There is a saying ‘the exception proves the rule’ I dont really like that because if it was a rule, it wouldn’t have an exception, what I like better is my own creation ‘the exception proves the generality’.  I have long railed against modern women, but my claims are backed up, often by actual facts such as wage gap lies.  Further, EDK’s argument essentially suggests that because there is some girl out there smarter or stronger than me, that I am therefore not stronger than other girls, because I was beat by a girl, its a very circular style of reasoning.

Here is another one about NAWALT you may want to read, Eurdite Dark Knight, https://eruditeknight.wordpress.com/2013/08/02/white-knight-suicidal-idea-now-might-have-been-good-then/

Just because you have never loved a woman, or a woman has never loved you, does not mean you should place all your hate towards their sex.’  

If I was a feminist I might shriek ‘You dont know me!!!’ The reality though, is this arugment is entirely emotionally based, with a does of ad hominem thrown in.  Arguing against people that arent capable of detecting fallacies, these type are extremely effective and also in front of a crowd, they work damn well, you can paint the opponent as a loser, and they dont gain the ground back by pointing out its fallacious nature.  What doesnt change is that how does me loving or not being loved at all affect the validity of a claim?  Stated another way, say I make the claim ‘2 +2 =4’ to which someone says ‘just because you arent loved doesnt mean you should place all your faith in your math claim’.  Its completely unrelated.  As anecdotal evidence, I have loved as a matter of fact, I have a lot of love in my life, and I ‘loved’ a girl that fucked me over. (https://eruditeknight.wordpress.com/2013/07/13/the-confession-of-ek-how-i-was-forced-to-take-the-pill/)

Women ARE smart.’

Said like a white knight.  If it was so self-evident why would it need constant repetition?  I’m strong, I really am! I can bench 400, I really can!!!

If you actually believe half of what you say, this grudge and prejudice you hold against them will show right through when interacting. As a result, they will immediately turn their head.

Unfortunately, EDK, this is patently false.  The entire PUA/red pill/ mgtow movements are founded on the truth that treating women as your equal is how you lose, and treating them as inferior is how you win.  I do not condone this reality, but it is a reality none the less. Girls are pedestal-ized their whole life, so when you are nice, you do not register in her mind, you are disposable.  When you are mean, cocky, aggressive you are different to her, you stand out.  On an evolutionary point, the aggressive men are the ones women are selected for to like.  Thats why peacocking works, it acts as if you are a badass, without being called out on it in our pussy society. (https://eruditeknight.wordpress.com/2013/05/21/countdown-5-traits-of-a-man-3-confidence-and-ability/)

‘Underneath all this emotion I sense a hopeless romantic that just wants a woman who can love him as much as he is capable of giving. A good way to find this woman is to start looking for the positive things in people rather than the negative.’

You are right, I actual am a closet romantic, but it is something nearly dead and gone in this world.  Women are not in the right mindset to understand things like gifts, and devotion, their hypergamy is completely unrestrained, so in a previous life a man giving her resources was something she needed and latched onto.  But now with so many suitors, it is ‘deserved’ and expected, and with so many coming in, you are meaningless.  When you are that ‘fake badass’ it confuses them, ‘why doesnt this guy need me?’.  Implicit in this reversal is the ‘guy needing the girl’ which is totally false from a survival perspective, but regardless, it circumvents the misled reality girls subscribe to.  After all, all guys ‘need her’ she is led to believe, so when the guy doesnt need her, it activates the correct ancient pathways of that he must have a glut of resources and can be picky.  Thus…girls are attracted to it.

Girls are currently misled, thats what makes them dangerous now, not that they were always that way

Girls are currently misled, thats what makes them dangerous now, not that they were always that way



Random musings

I was trolling Plenty of fish, and came across a few hits, and also I want to list some incoming search terms.


First we have a either lesbian women, or the typical feminist who is far better than guys, here summary is short and fitting: “Just assume I’m super kickass and we can go from there I guess.”

Ahh yes, you ARE the prize after all… moving on


This girl looks pretty damn cute, possibly fake, but she is 24 but seems to instinctually understand the concept of the Wall: “I’m sweet as pecan pie I’m looking for something long term I’m getting older I’m tired of jumping around”

Woah, tired of the cock carousel already?


I saw a story somewhere about some bullshit about the top searches through google.  It was a bunch of shit like harlem shake at that stuff.  Just looking right now ‘downtown abbey’ is #1 I dont know what that stupid shit is, maybe a show.  But it is VERY clear to me how rigged those results are. Really, just ask yourself, would google post ‘big breasted girl gets slammed by huge dick’ as their #1 search?

Now some search terms that have led to my blog:

sex graph (of what? I have no idea)

hot girl (My #1 search term!)

Erudite Knight (Damn straight!)

image of women with big (they got so excited they couldnt finish the search)

mgtow movement (yes I do actually get legit traffic)

mega boobs (Not just regular….MEGA!)

women are shit (haha, I am not making this up)

how to be the best woman (woah!  If you are hot let me know!)

sexy anime girls with black hair (well, specific tastes)

hot girls bubies(bubies!!!)

intermittent reinforcement relationships (hey, intellectual traffic!)

how to be the best woman i can be (A: hot and sexually available)

women give me the shits (well…)

women dont give a fuck (amen)

nude blonde chicks getting fucked (hey the real #1 google search)

i sucked my boyfriend pennis without any sex but he feel pain and etchey how it woud happen? (hahahah, oh man, this is worthy of a yahoo answers)

i want to see sexy girls pictures on bed (hey at least he is honest)

Here you go brother:

Hot anime girl

Hot anime girl

Giving the people what they want.

Anatomy of female power

You may now kiss your slave master (Notice her LEANING AWAY from him)

I just finished a book this morning called ‘Anatomy of female power’, which I can not remember where I got the book from (inevitably some manosphere comment or recommendation) but it was a very good book that opened my mind to a few things about women and feminism I did not think.

First, this book was written in 1990 and by an african guy, both of which are relevant.  I will go into details but he lays out female power, and at that time thought that feminism was waning because of its ultimately self-destructive tendency, obviously it hasnt, but that does not detract from his message.  Also originally being from africa where evidently the women were much more open about their power over males that ‘marriage was how I get a nest-slave’ and that women have songs about enslaving men coming to the UK where he lived was a likely reality shock of seeing all these females playing the victim card.

His premise is as follows: male ‘power’ is of an overt/in your face nature, whereas female power is subtle, behind the scenes, society reinforced, and because females control most males they therefore have more power.

Further, his main point is pretty damn simple: a complete outsider looking at a typical relationship or marriage would easily conclude the female is the superior of the two, the male works himself to death to give resources to the female.

The female has many tools at her disposal to train the male, anything from withholding sex, flirting with other guys to elicit jealousy, getting pregnant, all of which are ultimately supported by the society.

Essentially, men have a very effective trap for them: within their own power structure things like ‘honor’ are how they distinguish one from another, honor is something that must be kept at all times lest his fellow males exile him.  Within an all male structure, it works.  The problem becomes that females have easily co-opted it for their own use.  For example the biggest use is if a guy gets a girl pregnant its his job to ‘man up’ and take care of the kid. It is the ‘right’ thing to do.  Further, because it has become accepted as the ‘right’ thing to do fellow men will regulate each others behavior as casting out as a pariah some guy who does not do the ‘honorable’ thing.  This is the exact same mentality that treats single moms as somehow great heroes and the dad who left as irresponsible losers…oh and the men who marry single moms as honorable heroes for saving the girl.

Think about this last line ‘saving the girl’ this is how conventionally girls maintained so much power and control.  She gives the illusion of needed saved which our ‘hero males’ were raised to do.  So what does she need saving from?  Anything from her economic mess, her early pregnancy, her ‘mean dad’ or whatever ail her white knight can save her from.

The author lays out that throughout life a guy is routinely trapped and indoctrinated by women.  From his childhood his mom rears him, and this sets the stage for future female worship.  Upon getting older he is then enthralled by finding a girl he hopes to marry, and is dominated by either finding a girl, or if he has a girl keeping her.  In reality it is typically the girl manipulating the guy.  Really now how many of you have at least one guy you can point to that used to be baller and now is slowly and steadily being whipped by his girl into a ‘responsible’ ‘adult’ ‘male’?  Finally he gets married, which he was led to believe was some paradise of sex and love, and unwittingly is a hoist to his own petard as the power the women has over him in this position is great indeed.  Thus throughout his life he has unknowingly played the subservient role to a female the entire time.

As the author saw it, there were three types of girls: (and it is insane to see how these types have manifested today) 1: the matriarch-admitting and matriarch-loving women. 2: the tomboy. 3. the angry feminist

1: These are the women who WANT to status quo (pre feminism) meaning they did not want to work, they were happy at home raising kids.  The easiest example is imagine Victorian women, who were quite content over tea to be gossiping about everything while the man slaves away somewhere.  Modern day versions of this are basicly the ‘red-pill women’ or the stereotypical conservative women who wants her family and her family values.  They are somewhat opposed to feminism because they 1: do not want to work, and 2: do not want the truth of their power revealed and abandoned as more and more guys become disillusioned with feminism.

2:  These are the type that think they are boys, or wish they were boy.  So typically they are tacitly feminist.  They like the ‘be anyone you want to be’ mantra of feminists, they like the ability to have their own businesses etc as it is ‘manlike’, basically the type of girl that likes all the power of females, and likes the new found power of the male realm feminism has given her.

3: The militant feminist, these are the typical angry at society or especially men.  These are the type that say type1 females are ‘traitors’ to their sex, and that type1 girls are willing slaves to the ‘patriarchy’.  Now see this book was written in 1990 and it was obvious from his writing that this group was still small.  This was about my only complaint about the book as he thought that these type of women were naturally self-destructive enough that they would disappear from censure by the type1 females.  However we know that didnt happen.  Militant feminists have steadily grown.

Exhibit A


I could not believe the accuracy this guy had back then.  Among his predictions he said there were three types of men, the macho – who believes only in conventionally power, and therefore is utterly oblivious to the manipulation he is under- ; the musho – basically the feminized male-; and the masculinist – the forerunner to MRA/MGTOW guys.  There was one specific line in here where he mentioned the musho guys as they get progressively more whipped they then become the biggest ‘missionaries’ for the feminist movement, which that degree of foresight was impressive thinking of all these whipped males from the fallen hugo swayez or all the self-flagellating males who have ‘male guilt’.

Another thing he mentioned which I thought was interesting and has only gotten worse was his statements about the militant feminists who some dress provocatively and then get upset or charge that any man who shows interest or acts on the impulse should be punished severely.  (Reminds me of the multitude of false rape charges I personally have seen along which heard)  “Just because I dress like a slut doesnt mean I am a slut or want sex.”

Here is the crux of his book, females have power over males for a few reasons:

1: they withhold sex which males desperately crave,

2: they conventionally took care of domestic skills such as keeping him fed,

3: they can give him a child,

4: they were pedastlized as victims needed protecting.

Now as I mentioned, the only thing this guy got wrong was he said feminism was a destructive movement to female power and would naturally self regulate itself away, implictally in a short time and not amount to much of a social movement.  I totally agree that feminism is super destructive (to just about everything) but he was wrong about it not gaining traction, however he is completely right that it will implode because of this list above^

Feminism has essentially taken away 3 out of the 4 powers a female had over males.  The only thing females still retain is 3: the ability to give a man a child- a very very mighty sword they weild over males (which laws to back them up) and while this IS power they hold, this is the only one not immediatly imperiled by feminist movement.  It is still being sacrificed though by the whole mentality that ‘she doesnt need a kid’ or ‘career oriented’ bullshit that infests middle class white girls that are feminists main demographic.

Ways feminism is slitting its own throat: Lets start with 4, the victim menality still exists in disgusting amounts to this day, but think about females now supposedly being let into combat, do you think a victorian women would have EVER thought that would happen or was a good idea?  Feminists keeping bitching about equality in the work place enough and guys might start asking why dont we get some female quotas in coal mining and crab fishing and front line deaths.

2:  Now this one was interesting to me, as by the time I became of age domestic skills were gone, girls cant do shit.  I mean this literally, I could sew better and cook better than 98% of the girls I went to college with, and I only considered myself proficient not deeply skilled or anything.  There was a time girls co-opted guys self sufficiency by cooking, cleaning etc everything for him, so he could never leave her because he didn’t know how to do any of this.  Sadly, most guys still dont, and both sexes settle for endless ‘gourmet’ fast food instead of cooking themselves.

1:  This is interesting as there are entire blogs devoted to trying to get girls to ‘give it up’.  But in reality there is more sex flowing now than in the last 100 years (barring maybe the 70s, but I bet these days have those rocked).  Stds rates are something I’d use as evidence of rampart sex.  But regardless back in the day girls would coyly bait males with their pussy if ‘only’ they would marry them.  As much as I utterly hate the song ‘paradise by the dashboard lights’ this is the exact type of mentality that once existed predominantly, guy gets super turned on repeatedly by coy girl, and only release is promised if he devotes his life to her.  Now…girls are sluts.  That is the sad truth.  Will some girls demand over-inflated price for their used snatch?  Certainly, but on the whole girls want sex too and feminism has abolished the covenant by which females were able to extract much higher premiums for.

The destruction of feminism is picking up speed, especially with the internet, guys sharing stories of getting burned and collectively sharing knowledge.  Further, all these reasons I outlined are things girls once had exclusive domain and power oveir, and are being eviscerated from within.  Feminism is in no way empowering, where does it tell girls to do this or that for their dreams, instead it simple says things like a real man shouldnt make you cook, or that a real woman gets a career and (laughably) can have a family after her 20s or 30s.

Now think about this, feminism has inadvertently killed themselves in a multitude of ways, because think about what the author called the masculinist (aka MGTOW) and how females are now completely useless to him.  Anything advantage and way they COULD HAVE gotten our MGTOW male they have squandered, they dont cook/clean anymore, they are ugly thus sex is less of a prospect, most are not going to be giving out kids because they are more concerned with ‘careers’, and most are hostile to guys anyway.  So a typical guy who gets even a little bit it like ‘well what the fuck do I need a girl for anyway?  I cant get a kid true, but I was not getting one anyway, so other than that she is useless to me.’

Feminists do NOT fucking get it: if you are ugly, cant cook/clean, are a bitch, and are not giving anyone a kid a guy worth ANYTHING will not want you!  Everything that made you FEMININE was/is what guys want, and your unexamined belief in ‘feminism’ is going to eventually get you working in a salt mine somewhere wondering why life sucks so bad when you could have been at home with your slave working for you instead.

The delusion of course is on multiple levels, as certainly any high value guy does not want a feminist piece of trash.  But even the ‘ideal’ of a women who would stay at home and ideally stay hot, cook and produce kids still ultimately controls him as he is just a wage slave.  Complicated.  But…that is how life is, and why most people would rather not think and just get taken advantage of.  I realize the delusion of feminism, but personally is the slavery of marriage with a ‘typical’ female any better?  Certainly not, but what options remain?

“Just go to work for me already fucker.”

‘I give up on girls’ – A MGTOW primer pt1 – Basics of the blogsphere

If you are new, and any of the following thoughts have entered your mind (some of these are real search terms directed to my blog): “I give up on women” “women have it so much easier” “why does everyone hate males” “couldn’t give a shit about women’s needs” (< perhaps one of my favorite) then sit down for a spell, allow me to assist you in returning to a happy state of reality.

When I first started my blog about 6 months ago I certainly did not know the direction it would be taking, and I have found myself arriving at being one of the major voices for a growing movement – MGTOW or Men Going Their Own Way, an interesting mix of the MRA and the PUA movements, a hybrid different then both, that essentially has decided that modern women are not worthy of pursuing, and that happiness is NOT directed, derived, or in any way related to the existence of a female in your life.

It is unfortunate, but almost always any man who finds his way into MRA/PUA/MGTOW likely failed with women in one regard or another, I should change that to ‘fail’ because it might entirely not have been their fault, but at the end, the women and the man were no longer together.  I would say 90% of males experience a loss or failing of some kind and they naturally ask ‘why?’ and are forced to drastically re-evaluate their world view.  The other 10% are good friends with some guy that gets burned super bad, and decides ‘damn, he went down pretty hard, maybe I should listen to what he is saying’.

Essentially a male gets to MGTOW by one of two paths: a PUA who decides a life of one-night stands is getting nowhere, or a fleeced MRA who is tired of dealing with women in any capacity.

Path 1: The PUA who hates killing his heart

Almost always, men turn to PUA – pick up artist- style of blogs and advice after getting rocked.  Essentially they conclude they can harden their heart, and pick up as many women as they dream and it will fill this hole the now-broken-former-idealist-who-once-believed-in-love has in his heart.  After all whatever badass role model they have locked deep in their head, he gets with a lot of girls, maybe that is why he is so sad, he just isnt slamming enough girls out.

He reads about techniques, ‘peacocking’, ‘negging’, how to fake confidence, how to play number games…and the promise if you follow it: unlimited girls for the banging.  He does it, maybe feels stupid at first, but if he keeps at it…well I’ll be, he is actually getting sex!  But somewhere between one drunken blowjob or hoping he didn’t get a STD from that last girl he starts wondering ‘is there more to life than this’?

Pick up artist stuff works.  Do not get me wrong.  In fact it has a lot to teach the MGTOW, namely that confidence is key to interactions, and to not take women to serious.  But what happens is the eventual MGTOW starts to realize any happiness he is getting from sex is ultimately short lived. He is defining his life – even if it is a life insulting women and acting badass- by the goal of getting sex from women.  The future MGTOW decides ‘why the fuck would I want to waste time at a bar or texting or ‘gaming’ some bitch for a night of sex?

The near-complete MGTOW starts to conclude ‘well, I get more satisfaction from going to the gym’ or ‘completing my hobbies’ or ‘having fun without women’ and his transformation is practically done.

Path 2: The MRA who is tired of this shit

MRA come typically from a more economic background.  The PUA path was primarily driven by emotion, you got left, your girl cheated on you etc. and you are emotionally hurt.  The MRA typical has a much more substantial claim, and almost always from Divorce.  Essentially they were married, and the women cheats, leaves, becomes intolerable etc and they split, and due to the unfairness of courts suddenly half his wealth is gone.  HALF OF HIS LIFE’S WORK IS GONE.

The MRA thinks ‘what they fuck!?  How is this close to fair?  That bitch did shit, she didn’t even suck my dick now she gets half my money?’  Thus, you will see a LOT of blogsphere warning against marriage…for damn good reason because of what the MRA experienced first hand.

The MRA starts to realize how utterly fucked up the laws and courts and society are if you are male.  The more he looks, the more he comes across things about how much Bipolar Disorder (which is about 85% female) destroys families, and how rare the male ever gets custody in child disputes.  He sees that during a supposed domestic violence, the male goes away because ‘he is always the aggressor’

MRA are out there fighting the legal fight in any way they can.  Eventually if they swap to MGTOW it is because they decide it is no longer worth it continuing in a system so rigged against them, and would rather live their own life.




What has been real fun about all this is finding out all various ‘genres’ of blogs out there.  For example two of my first fellow bloggers are loosely MGTOW, not that they even use the word, but they talk about issues BEYOND women: http://gregariouswolf.wordpress.com/ and http://odinslounge.wordpress.com/  and http://cogitansiuvenis.blogspot.com/ .

Then there are are real/admitted MGTOW that are actively out there furthering the term and what it means, http://theobserverwatches.blogspot.com/ and http://whoism3.wordpress.com/ and http://stonerwithaboner.wordpress.com/. 

Then there are the full on MRA like http://reyekomra.wordpress.com/

Then you have the women that actually understand or are at least sympathetic to our plight like my poster Liz and Sophia  http://tarnishedsophia.wordpress.com/ and Darling http://darlingdoll82.wordpress.com/

MGTOW is NOT a hedonistic movement, although some may be, at its root, it ultimately might be best expressed as ‘I am living my own life…and I don’t need a women to do it’.