The rise of nationalism

I must admit about 2-3 years ago I was not sure there was any hope for getting out of the liberal sewer we were all getting drug down, too many faggy ‘triggered’, minority loving emotional arguments that ANY dissension against was viewed as racist/’stupid’ etc.  Honestly, they could have kept the status quo going and there would have been no problem, but the recent missteps have backfired so bad the rise of nationalism and backdoor racism have hit a critical point that has given me renewed hope.

Take Europe, the horde of muslims that are raping and bombing their way across the country simply adds fuel to EVERY ultra right wing/nationalist ideology while painting liberalism as a failed thought process.

Trump in our country could be an inside candidate, at this point I doubt it as he has unleashed far too much hate and ‘real talk’ that never should have seen the light of day.  Too many people say ‘yeah, we REALLY should boot out the mexicans/muzz etc’

It is really coming to a head, its great.


Faith based science

If you are on a game show, and you pick 1 of 3 doors, and I take a wrong one away, and I offer you the swap, should you take it?  Read on to find out.

Science was was fairly recently practiced, and even in some circles still is a superior thought process that its strength is allowing itself open for change if compelling evidence comes along – something faith/religion ardently deny.  For that reason anyone with a brain SHOULD in general subscribe to such a thought process of ‘this is how I currently believe it, if I see a good reason I can switch.

However, now science has become sickeningly close to religion in that models are changed to fit the theory, problems are hand-waved away and superiority is assumed.

One example is physics and dark matter/string theory.  Essentially string theory posits matter on a deep level is composed of vibrating strings, a major part of the theory suggests there SHOULD be more mass in the universe than there apparently is…so what does faith based science do instead of thinking the theory is wrong SINCE IT DOESNT MATCH REALITY?

They change reality, in that the answer must be ‘dark matter’ something that we can’t see, but sure at shit it has got to be out there!

This is the kind of thing that gives science a bad name, instead of thinking your theory is shit, and amending reality to fit it, why not amend your fucking theory?

There is a guy at work, liberal but fairly smart in science, however he got caught up on the door question and INSISTED I was wrong on something that is a pretty simple thought puzzle to explain.  I was reminded of the absolutly god-like devotion to science these types have, even in the face of pure wrongness.

In the door puzzle you SHOULD switch because you go from a 1/3 to a 2/3 chance.  Before you flip out, and mistakenly think it is still 50/50 consider 1000 doors.  You pick 1, this is a 1/1000 chance, I take away 998 door that are wrong.  So what are the odds that of the 1000 you HAPPENED to pick the right one, or that this sole remaining door is in fact the right door?  In 999/1000 times it is the right one.

Think this over, because this tripped up a hard science devotee, believing no way ‘his god’ was wrong.

The ‘correctness’ of the Left’s Socialism and the Right’s anti-immigrant

I have stated before on here about how USA politics are broken into such ways that each side has a glimpse of the truth so that their ardent followers say ‘see!?  See!?  How can you deny this!?” while being filled with falsehoods that are taken as gospel.

For this I am going to take two simple beliefs of both sides:


Social style economics: higher tax rates but the benefit is social programs to help those down on luck, invest in infrastructure, healthcare etc.

Pro-multicultural: Let all cultures in, and we will be enriched by their diversity which will make us more well-rounded.


Capitalist economics – Everything you do, you do on your own, do what it takes to get ahead, individualism rampart, profits are yours but so are your problems.

Anti-multi cultural/immigration – Rarely directly stated but that whites are better, and we don’t want your kind here, we esp. don’t want your cultural.


The problem is, these beliefs are partly antithetical to each other.  Take liberalism, socialism is great I truly do approve of it, but the problem is it is a socialism for the minorities at the cost of the producers – whites and asians primarily.  Whites work to fund blacks in inter cities, that is a fact while getting very little benefit.  Thus republican criticism is valid about ‘hating socialism’ because you are NOT benefiting your in-group.

Likewise capitalism has a natural bend towards anti in-group because if you can screw your neighbor to get ahead you will.

Naturally, socialism and nationalism/racism/ingroup mentality IS sustainable.  You are sacrificing for those you are either directly related to, or have distant genetic relationship vs the current mess where your sacrifices go to people that could care less about you and would slit your throat in an instant.