It may not come as much of a surprise to much, but Israel PAYS people to sit and essentially troll sites with posistive propaganda for jews, israel, the plalastine conflict etc.
This is not the first time this happens, and the only stunning thing to me is that this slipped out at all. (‘they know, Shut it down!) The internet represents a MAJOR threat to corruption, while also being extremely useful for corruption.
It is extremely well documented sites like youtube engage in heavy comment moderation and censorship for a vague ‘hate/intolerance’ reasons. Now, consider the impact this has on hapless viewers, they watch some political video and let’s saw something like 40% of the comments are critical of Israel, pointing out the country is illegitimate, it was a payment for ww2 etc, 40% pro-israel (paid shill or not) and 20% misc. Youtube censors ALL of the ‘hate’ messages, so now the reader of comments is going to be 66% pro-israel and 33% of unrelated comments. The reader NEVER KNOWS there are people who do not agree with this.
Major media outlets like facebook etc are routinely bombed by shillery and censorship, and it creates this vast false group-consensus where every single person apparently thinks Israel bombing tribals is justice, ‘had it coming’ etc.
‘And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed – if all records told the same tale – then the lie passed into history and became truth.’ 1984
‘Gamersgate’ if you aren’t familiar is nearly the same thing, only feminist shills/shams are coming out of the wood work. A lot of other bloggers have done this in depth, but suffice to summarize there was two major things, one was a girl who slept her way to video game success and the second was this girl anita who makes money off criticizing video games and then playing victim over people raging at her. Both cases nearly ALL criticism of them on youtube, facebook, google etc is scrubbed clean.
The average person who doesn’t look into it hard only sees some ‘poor girls’ who these angry white ‘losers’ are harassing, never seeing the truth. Never seeing in action these women using sex and victimhood to gain rampant success all while claiming inequality.
‘For how could you establish even the most obvious fact when there existed no record outside your own memory? He tried to remember in what year he had first heard mention of Big Brother. He thought it must have been at some time in the sixties, but it was impossible to be certain. In the Party histories, of course, Big Brother figured as the leader and guardian of the Revolution since its very earliest days.’ 1984