I wanted to touch on this more in depth, and a commenter on the last post gives me to perfect opportunity:
Genderneutrallanguage writes: “I disagree. If there is to be social revolution it is going to come from the women. Women are the only people that can fight the system at this point. It’s just a question of if/when they will stand up and fight rather than expecting men to do it for them. I really hope it’s before feminist force me into concentration camps….err male only re-education centers, that’s no better…..maybe live in caring workshops!!!
I just hope it doesn’t take the government enacting the SCUM manifesto for women to realize it’s their turn to get shot at.”
This was in counter to my assertion that men are the threat to society’s structures, and thus the ones targeted to keep down.
GNL, I ask you to take a longer view here, and you will see where I am coming from. In this feminist nightmare we live in, I actually completely ‘agree’ with you that women are the only ones that can do ‘something’, but that is the problem, there is ZERO reason for them to do it. I also disagree with the implicit assumption in there that women have the long term will to even effect such a change.
Women are incapable of countering feminism for two major reasons, as a sex they lack the will to consider the damage it has done, and to undue it when it benefits them so strongly. Consider in contrast the small number of females who oppose feminism (commenter Liz here is a great example) where she understands the damage, but is there anything she can do? As alluded to in my last post feminism has shored up the defenses against ‘traitors’ like women who think maybe feminism isnt so great of a thing.
Part 2 of this, is that women benefit too much. Its a bit like slavery, on some level you may know its wrong, but you are benefitting, so why would you want to stop? This is literally what it is like, because I have met a fair amount of girls who ‘dont consider themselves feminists’ (though I laugh at their ‘independent’ lifestyle) and ok, they dont support feminism in that they will go out and march for it, but why would they EVER oppose this system that gave them this job, funnels them money, allows them to ride the cock carousel guilt free, traps guys for money at nearly any time….ad neasum. The answer is, they wouldn’t. On a subconscious level there is too much to lose.
Now, to get to men, the reality is that EVERY political movement, or anything of note in history is led by men, it is biology pretty simple. I do not subscribe to the ‘patriarchy’ keeping poor women down, as history is long and if it was able to happen, it should have happened. Its pretty fucking obvious if you take off the regressive-liberal blinders and realize men have been more disposable as a sex, so we are endowed with more risk-taking, more aggression, more drive etc. Men are the ones who are able to calculate that some shitty life isn’t worth living and they would rather fight and perhaps die for something better.
It is this reason men are targeted.
Females have become our enemies, and obviously they were never meant to be. But this is the entire point of a divide and conquer strategy, by dividing something as important as the two sexes against each other, it spares the real people in power from having anything to worry about. Its clever, and a bit painful how simple of a strategy it is, but that it is so effective. Men are now stymied, slowed, even destroyed BY THE ONES WHO ONCE SUPPORTED THEM.
We live in this corporate oligarchy, let me repeat that a ‘corporate oligarchy’, not a democracy, not a republic, nothing. Our decisions are meaningless, our votes a sham to help the illusion, the two parties are the same (and if such a statement disagrees with you, you have much to learn, start by looking up that both parties are funded by the SAME corporations) the only thing that matters is having a zombie populace that is more concerned with the latest starlet, the newest touchdown, or the hope of a beer or a new porn to deaden their minds.
What are things that are criticized in our current ‘enlightenment’? Male virtues like honor, males qualities like strength, or the willingness to engage in violence. They are brutish, unneeded, un-evolved etc. That a ‘real man’ is in touch with his feminine feelings, he would never resort to violence, he would ‘talk it out’ etc. Notice a lot of this is defined in female terms, but consider the general idea that we can ‘resolve this peacefully’, meaning the very virtues that defined a man – strength- are now being taken off the table. It is not a coincidence that ‘talking it out’ is a losing battle against the big media who will drown your voice faster that you can take a breath. Why do you think the fact that there are male abuse victims is nearly unknown, or that women iniate60%+ of divorces, and if they have a college degree initiates divorce at over 90% of the time! [http://www.divorce-lawyer-source.com/faq/emotional/who-initiates-divorce-men-or-women.html ] (Guess that’s part of being liberated)
Women have nearly everything to lose in this system. Men have nearly everything to gain. That is why men are bombarded with every avenue of attack, from attacking their being, to poisoning the water with estrogen, to endless fem-indoctrination at school for 12 years plus, honor is co-opted into ludicrous ideas that its ‘honorable’ to marry a single mom. This society is shot, no one can save it, men are incapable by system-design, and women wont. Its only when it all collapses will a new way begin, and I predict it will be very harsh against both the bankers that got us here, and the sluts that were the ground troops against us.