Women Peacock

As an aside, wordpress has been fucked up lately and I could not log on for a while, also I got an update that wordpress was starting to advertise on my posts, I have no idea what you might be seeing, and it it out of my control.

I recently posed a question as to why in most animals it is the male who ‘peacocks’ and not the female, but in our race both do. (http://wp.me/p2YaVQ-eo)

A very brief biological primer is that since males are disposable and should be ‘lucky’ to get a female pregnant they have to do everything to stand out, and there is no pressure for the girl to really do anything but the bare minimum of staying alive.

First, consider the last sentence there, is this not what we are seeing in very large numbers in America, namely girls doing the MINIMUM of staying ‘fit’, meaning being fat fucks that wobble between one computer and hamburger shack to another?  Because by and far selective pressure on a majority of women has DISAPPEARED in modern society, you do not have to be strong, fast, smart, healthy,even hot.  I blame feminism for a lot of the social reasons (obvious there are things like high fructose corn syrup messing up diets, but that is beyond this post).

So we have feminism telling girls that ‘beauty is on the inside’ and guys to ‘man up’ and take those used goods and ugly fat women.  That a ‘real man’ would pick a girl by her personality, not her scale-tipping weight.

Now here is what is interesting, I think the human genome must have a very rapid ability to adapt to changing social pressures.  Because throughout history, even recently what we would call ‘ugly’ was common.  Consider the wild west, most of the women calling them homely would be a compliment.  But, this was because men had to take what they could get out there, thus no pressure on girls.

I have been talking about ugly girls, but the point of this post is why are there hot girls at all?  The reason is because at times there have been very large selective pressures on females.  Don’t cry them a river, its because it is due to mass male die offs -ie war.

Generally where are the hottest girls thought to reside?  Most people will say Europe, dont give me that ‘cultural relativism’ shit either.  The hottest girls generally come from east europe.  Period.  Now…what has recently happened in the last 100-150 years?  Well…a lot of men killing each other.  When I say east europe, I am talking most of the balkan states, poland, ukraine etc.  In the east europe zone we got things kicking with wars such as the crimean war, WW1, WW2 being major contributors.

MILLIONS of males died.  Yes women died too, but by and large it was males.  How many?  Well how about the USSR’s ‘impressive’ number of 20-24 MILLION dead?

Now what happens if we assume an even 50/50 spilt of the populace before a war, but then 80%+ of millions dead are males?  It shifts that dynamic huge.  So after a war…suddenly the girls who decided they had no pressure on them and stayed fat…were forgotten.  Those girls that had bigger breasts, nicer hips ratios…well it was now the guys who commanded the premium.  So what is any typical guy going to do?  I’ll take the best one I can!  So we see very high evidence of this female selection pressure produce some tremendously hot girls.  I think we need to keep pressure on girls more often… Anyway here is an interesting document fact of what I am talking about, namely the east europe gets married earlier while they are more fertile – meaning the girls were likely picked on looks and not much else.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hajnal_line

Today, we face an interesting bifurcation.  We have 90%+ of girls who dont give a fuck, and biologically are ‘correct’ as a lot of guys will take their bloated carcass, yet we have this emerging ‘alpha’ guys that are throwbacks to how men are supposed to be (or at least peacock like gangsters which also works), and there is a selective pressure on moderate to attractive girls for the few guys.  Nearly the same thing as post wars, more girls than guys (because most beta guys will only get used)

It will be interesting, as time goes on we will see a division of very hot girls who have been after alphas, and a majority of trash everyone else has devolved into.




14 thoughts on “Women Peacock

  1. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again – any Real Man that doesn’t take a sex vacation to an Asian country (Thailand and Japan readily come to mind) before even CONSIDERING marriage in the West is a FOOL!

    Once you’ve tasted the sweet long-forgotten fruit of being revered and respected as the KINGS we are inside, you’ll never again want the fatty JUNK FOOD that Western women are.

      • The last thing I heard about Japan (still haven’t been there myself) was that the women know nothing of one-night-stands (the ones that aren’t modern).

        The modern ones might be working at a hostess club or something (not to be mistaken with a brothel or strip club, though the attention you are paid is very intimate).

        Japan would be one of those places you go to have FUN, where your odds of getting off are slightly better than here. Thailand is the sure thing, but I don’t speak Thai.

  2. The Chinese should be a much better looking people. They not only lost in the tens of millions during the second world war, but about 70 million during Mao’s “cleansing”. Cambodia lost about twenty percent of its population in the 70s, too, under the Khmer Rouge.

    • Liz, forgive me, but I can’t tell if you’re being facetious here.

      Also EK, if the theory you propose is correct, then heavy women should be FAVORED under the evo psych. They have sturdy bodies that will bear loads of offspring.

      How are you defining “hotness”: By facial beauty, or bangable voluptuous hot body? A combination? What’s your ideal ratio?

      • Am I being facetious? Both yes and no. I’m hard pressed to think of people who look less like the Balkans/Polish groups than the Chinese (and Cambodians) if that’s the standard for most beautiful women in the world. But they’ve encountered proportionately as much, actually more, war-like annihilation during the past century than eastern Europe has.

      • No, heavy women would be favored in endless war (perhaps what Liz is suggesting) but europe is in cycles, meaning brutal fighting, than peace.

        When a soldier comes back from the war, he is NOT going to pick a fat girl when hot/thin girls are able to be selected from.

      • EK, no one is fat after a resource depleting war. The entire continent of Europe and Asia was filled with very very thin people after WWII.

        I can tell you what my husband thinks. He thinks the countries with stereotypically “good looking women” are the ones with geographical advantages (especially mountains)…otherwise when war breaks out the good looking women are the ones taken away/used by the enemy unless they can run and hide somewhere.

  3. By “eastern European women are hottest” do you just mean you prefer the thin/sultry body type, or you have a thing for blondes? I’d agree with the body type part since I think celebrities like Shakira and Halle Berry are quite beautiful! Then again, I also like the classic ladies like Audrey Hepburn and Julie Newmar.

    The thing is, EK, I’m unsure how much of a division we’ll see with looks. Your hypothesis makes sense on the front of it…but what if all the hot women go with rich men only? I’ve often seen very lovely women on the arms of very old/fat men, only some of whom I’d consider to still have a bit of physical attractiveness to them. (Saw this quite a lot in Las Vegas, actually. Though I suppose they could have been escorts and not mates.) To have the sort of division you’re talking about, exceedingly attractive women would have to mate exclusively with exceedingly attractive men. True, genetics might dictate that their coupling produce an average (or even unattractive) child, but most likely their kids would be quite nice looking.

    Until the majority of women begin to select mates for looks rather than resources, I’m thinking the division will probably stay where it is…
    What do you think?

    • Hmm, interesting point, I would counter it by saying that in general the more successful men are probably ‘better looking’ as an average then non-successful men. This is simply on the fact that better looking people are deferred to more, given more respect etc.

      So while I agree with your point that the man would be contributing less to the overall appearance of the child, I do no think it would be a true random disturbition at all.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s