I have actually been thinking a lot about a seemingly random exchange between (initally) two people…two on my blog. So over here ( https://eruditeknight.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/men-are-inherent-givers-women-are-inherrent-consumers/) check the comments. What essentially happened here was a argument between two people Sophia, a woman, and Lu Bu, a man.
It is important to at least read some of their comments so you get a general feel of the argument they were having. Essentially it was over another female named MK who she said she liked being submissive, and that real females should not mind being submissive. Lu Bu congratulated her on ‘getting it’, Sophia was surprised and somewhat appalled that a girl would want to submit to a guy. It devolved into at times some pretty humorous attacks on each other, however notice what was happening here: a girl and guy fighting…then watch what happened as the argument went on. Watch how when others got involved whose side was taken.
Was Lu Bu ‘meaner’ than Sophia, yes, probably, but the others jumped to her defense BECAUSE SHE WAS A GIRL. She was not defended because her points were somehow more valid, or in need of defending, it was because a big scary man attacking a poor girl and the white knight brigade (composed of females in this case!) had to ride to save the girl.
Truly think about this, because it is likely if you were involved in this your personal egos may be in the way right now, but reverse the roles. Lets have them make the exact same argument, but now its Empress Lu Bu and Tarnished Steve, Lu BU is now a girl and Sophia a guy, making same arguments (because the defense was never about the points, it was about a guy attacking a girl) no one attacks Empress in this position, after all who would attack a ‘girl’?
Back to the argument at hand, lets take a different look, what if Sophia was the meaner one here, calling him a ‘disingenuous bastard’ and telling him he must have a small dick and cant get any etc, would ANYONE have been like ‘Sophia you are being mean to him’?
Fuck no! I would wager, because I KNOW, that they would still attack him merely because they were antagonist to each other. That is the way the world works, in everything from small arguments to domestic violence, the girl is always right, the guy is always wrong. You can debate this until the end of the earth, the fact is, in domestic violence the women’s word > then the mans, and the man is going to jail. Why is it ok or somehow empowering for a girl to slap a guy ‘to put him in his place’ but to even touch a girl = bye bye see you in jail for the guy. In any smaller argument the guy will be labeled ‘argumentative’ or ‘mean to the poor girl’ or anything similar that excuses the girl and lambastes the guy.
Society (meaning guys and girls) do NOT defend the guy in a guy vs girl fight. EVER. A girl can be beating a guy INTO THE FUCKING GROUND and ‘oh he must have deserved it’, but a guy even has an argument with a girl and the whole world turns against him.
My girl readers here ‘get it’ more than the typical female, thats why what happened here was ironic (in that it still didnt matter) and instructive of how ingrained it was. Even our allies in the fight against feminism still have these default programs in their brain.
Think about what happened here, because you have just proved everything I have been saying since this blog started – that society in general will default to the female.